Descriptive analysis of permanent disability files for epicondylitis in food industry workers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4321/s0465-546x2021000200005Keywords:
Sick leave; musculoskeletal disorders; elbow tendinopathy; food industryAbstract
Introduction: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) represent a major health problem among workers in industrialized countries and are the main cause of temporary and permanent work disability in our country.
In the food industry, tasks that involve repetitive movements, forced and static postures are carried out, resulting in upper limb and spine pathologies. This type of work can cause tendon pathologies, among which is epicondylitis, triggered by repetitive movements of wrist extension and prono-supination of the forearm.
Objectives: To establish the prevalence of Permanent Disability files filed for epicondylitis presented in food industry workers.
To stratify the Permanent Disability files presented by food industry workers, both the files for epicondylitis and the files for the rest of musculoskeletal disorders, according to: age, gender, Autonomous Community, CIE-9 code, who initiates the file, qualification, resolution, type of professional contingency, contribution regime and CNO-11 classification.
To analyze the professional contingency and qualification variables with respect to the rest of variables.
To identify sectors susceptible to implementing improvements in preventive activity.
Method: This cross-sectional descriptive study will be carried out by collecting the data through the Alfa database (Automation of the Benefit Management Procedure) of the National Social Security Institute. The statistical program R Core Team 2021, version 4.0.5. will be used for the descriptive analysis of the data.
Results: We obtained 1,405 permanent disability records due to musculoskeletal disorders in the food industry workers during 2019.
Intervertebral disc disorders, arthrosis and tendinitis were the most frequent musculoskeletal disorders for which Permanent Disability files were submitted.
Of all the files submitted, the majority are for common illnesses.
The slaughterers and meat industry workers account for the largest number of files.
Of the total number of Permanent Disability files submitted, a similar number of those classified as non-disabled and Total Permanent Disability (47.1% and 46.4% respectively) were obtained.
Conclusions: Slaughterers are the group of workers with the highest number of Permanent Disability files for epicondylitis and tendinitis. In this regard, it should also be noted that most of the cases registered as occupational diseases are included in the tendinitis group.
It is noteworthy that although the percentage of approved files is similar for both sexes, the number of files filed by women is considerably higher.
The Permanent Disability files come predominantly from common illnesses and very few from occupational diseases. In terms of the contribution regime, although self-employed workers are the ones who file the fewest cases, they are the ones who are granted the most Total Permanent Disability as a percentage of the total.
Slaughterers and workers in the meat industry are those who would benefit most from implementing improvements in preventive measures in their workplace.
Downloads
References
Ufuk B, Burcu T. Work related musculoskeletal disorders at two textile factories in Edirne, Turkey. Balkan Med J. 2013;30(1):23-7. DOI: 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.069. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/2ZqQGxV
Zimmermann M. Estudio epidemiológico descriptivo de los partes cerrados notificados a CEPROSS: Periodo 2007-2012 [Internet]. Madrid: INSHT;2014 [acceso 8 de junio de 2020]. NIPO:272-14-028-7. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3jvwX7e
Henry M, Stutz C. A unified approach to radial tunnel syndrome and lateral tendinosis. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2006 Dec;10(4):200-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.bth.0000231580.32406.71. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3vFJhqj
Antuña S, Barco R, editores. Essentials in elbow surgery [Internet]. London: Springer London; 2014 [citado 4 de junio de 2020]. ISBN: 978-1-4471-4625-4. Disponible en: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4471-4625-4
Greene DP, Wolfe SW, editores. Green’s operative hand surgery. 6ª ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone; 2011.
Lee JT, Azari K, Jones NF. Long term results of radial tunnel release–the effect of co-existing tennis elbow, multiple compression syndromes and workers’ compensation. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(9):1095–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.07.018. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1748681507004044?via%3Dihub
Hortal-Alonso RM, Salido-Olivares M, Navarro-Alonso P, Candelas-Rodríguez YG. Epicondilitis. Semin Fund Esp Reumatol. 2005;6(2);79-88. DOI: 10.1016/S1577-3566(05)74488-2. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Egujd8
Berkowitz Deborah. Industria alimentaria. En: Enciclopedia de salud y seguridad en el trabajo [Internet]. Madrid: Ministerio de trabajo y Asuntos Sociales; 2001. p.67.35. Disponible en: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/161971/Cap%C3%Adtulo+67.+Industria+alimentaria
Argote JI. Seguridad y salud en el trabajo en la industria alimentaria: principales riesgos laborales y su prevención. Interempresas [Internet]. 2020 [acceso 17 de diciembre de 2020]; [aprox. 25 pant]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3vIwYtp
Informe anual de la industria alimentaria española, período 2019-2020 [Internet]. Madrid: Ministerio de agricultura, pesca y alimentación; 2020, [acceso 17 de diciembre de 2020]. 30-542507. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3jCr2gJ
Vega-Martínez S. Los trastornos músculo-esqueléticos de las mujeres (I): exposición y efectos diferenciales. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo. 2006, [acceso 24 de marzo de 2021]. Notas técnicas de prevención: NTP 657. Disponible en: https://www.insst.es/documents/94886/326775/ntp_657.pdf/b32d581a-ab53-432f-a30f-696e301eb606
Encuesta de población activa 2019. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Estadística. 2020, [acceso 1 de abril de 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.ine.es/daco/daco42/daco4211/epa0419.pdf
Informe anual de la industria alimentaria española, periodo 2018-2019 [Internet]. Madrid: Ministerio de agricultura, pesca y alimentación; 2020, [acceso 10 abril 2021]. 30-541380. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3BcLOt3
El reconocimiento de la enfermedad profesional: El largo periplo para el reconocimiento del carácter «profesional» de las enfermedades derivadas del trabajo [Internet]. Instituto Sindical de Trabajo Ambiente y Salud (ISTAS). 2017, [acceso 10 abril 2021]. EI2017-0002. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3mlUFo3
Real Decreto 1299/2006, de 10 de noviembre, por el que se aprueba el cuadro de enfermedades profesionales en el sistema de la Seguridad Social y se establecen criterios para su notificación y registro. Boletín Oficial de Estado, nº 302, (19-12-2006). Disponible en: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2006/BOE-A-2006-22169-consolidado.pdf
Estadística de accidentes de trabajo [Internet]. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Economía Social; 2019, [acceso 10 abril 2021]. NIPO: 117-20-036-5. Disponible en: https://www.mites.gob.es/estadisticas/eat/eat19/ATR_2019_Completa.pdf
Accidentes de trabajo bajo la perspectiva de género; C.A. del País Vasco; 2004-2013 [Internet]. País Vasco: Instituto Vasco de Seguridad y Salud Laborales (OSALAN). Octubre 2017, [acceso 15 abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Bo6gr8
De la Orden-Rivera MV, Fonte-Fernández MM, Zimmermann-Verdejo M. Informe anual de accidentes de trabajo en España 2019 [Internet]. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo; 2020, [acceso 15 abril 2021]. NIPO: 118-20-087-7. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3GxyQtG
Valle-Muñoz F. La discutible valoración restrictiva de la incapacidad permanente total en el trabajo autónomo. IUSLabor. 2016;(2):1-18. Disponible en: https://raco.cat/index.php/IUSLabor/article/view/312035
Afiliados último día del mes por provincias y secciones de actividad [Internet]. Madrid: Ministerio de Inclusión, Seguridad Social y Migraciones. 2021 [acceso 1 mayo 2021]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3GxDUya
Manual de prevención de riesgos laborales: mataderos e industrias cárnicas [Internet]. Madrid: Mutua de Accidentes de Trabajo y Enfermedades Profesionales de la Seguridad Social (Muprespa); 1999, [acceso 5 de mayo 2021]. M-2449-1999. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/31d7pp3
Guía de recomendaciones ergonómicas en la industria cárnica [Internet]. Madrid: Umivale; 2019, [acceso 8 mayo 2021]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3GqUi3A


